Prediction of Daniel Dutra Da Silva [306th] vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida [321st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Silva 2 - 2 Almeida
They have played 8 sets in total, with Silva winning 4 and Almeida winning 4. The last match between Silva and Almeida was at the M25 Lajeado, 03-11-2024, Final, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Dutra Da Silva | 2 |
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 2 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
81%
(
63 of
78)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 39 | Games Won | 40 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:50:49 | Average Match Time | 1:50:49 |
| 60% (150/251) | 1st Serve % | 67% (183/272) |
| 69% (103/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (120/183) |
| 48% (48/101) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (49/89) |
| 36% (10/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (10/33) |
| 38% (103/272) | Return Points Win % | 40% (100/251) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Silva 2 - 2 Almeida
Editorial Prediction:
Daniel Dutra Da Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
44%
(
33 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Thomas Faurel
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
54%
(
63 of
117)
1st Serve %
52%
(
76 of
146)
3
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
8
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
65 of
146)
140
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Enzo Camargo Lima
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Matias Soto
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (673/427) | Win/Loss | 59% (214/149) |
| 60% (1490/1008) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (492/339) |
| 54% (12437/10531) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4173/3572) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1887 | Aces Total | 637 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1619 | Total Double Faults | 635 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:39:19 |
| 528.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 385.09 |
| 59% (22651/38372) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14396/21771) |
| 67% (15282/22651) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9532/14396) |
| 50% (7854/15721) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3800/7375) |
| 47% (1997/4257) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1036/2328) |
| 43% (16495/38654) | Return Points Win % | 42% (9167/21931) |
| 61% (654/1070) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (211/353) |
| 69% (11/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 52% (146/282) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (55/109) |
| 51% (150/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (42/103) |
| 88% (660/580) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (230/190) |
| 12% (660/79) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (230/38) |
| 21% (439/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (133/24) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
